When Quirk Books offered me the opportunity to review the first installment of William Shakespeare's Star Wars I turned down the offer. I'd reviewed the first and the second and I was not a fan. After having been in a semester-long Shakespeare class that felt like I'd been in it for years, I was not happy having Shakespeare in my life again unless it was for school. However, after thinking about it for a bit I realized that I knew just the person who should review it for my blog: a fellow English major and blogger for Nerd Underground.Ladies and gentlemen, Angie presents to you: A review by Alex, her friend with the English degree!
“The Phantom Menace” has been regarded as the worst “Star Wars” movie of the big six. Having watched it as a young padawan, I have nothing but good memories of the forsaken film. But how does Ian Doescher’s, the author responsible for “William Shakespeare’s Star Wars” series, dramatization of “The Phantom Menace” hold up?
THE GOOD:
Fans of Shakespeare and the “Star Wars” series will have a fun time reading this play. Doescher's Shakespearean text is far easier to read and to understand than any of Shakespeare's original works. This makes it more accessible to those who are more fans of “Star Wars” than Shakespeare.
The setup for “The Phantom Menace” works well for the plot of a Shakespearean play. Two ambassadors go to negotiate with an evil federation taking advantage of a young queen. The heroes flee to the "wilderness" (aka Tatooine), they comeback to take what is theirs and the play’s drama is resolved by good conquering evil and people dying.
Doescher’s “The Phantom of Menace” further develops the original characters by fleshing them out with soliloquies. Characters are provided with more agency than what they had in the film. Padmé Amidala is a young queen, judged by the older council she’s surrounded by. Obi-Wan is a Jedi who’s grown weary of his position as apprentice to Qui-Gon. The most notable change Doescher does with “The Phantom Menace” is with Jar-Jar Binks.
It would have been easy to make Jar-Jar the fool character, as seen in many of Shakespeare’s plays. Doescher puts a spin on the most disliked character in all of “Star Wars.” Instead of being the fool providing the comic relief of the play, Jar-Jar is the trickster character. Jar-Jar is clever and plays the fool out of necessity to forward his plans of uniting the Gungans and the Naboo. His actions are no longer intended for comedic effect, but are sly moves to carry the story along. On Tatooine, he steals Sebulba's food, so they may meet with Anakin again, as opposed to just being a foolish move of a simpleton. Even the pivotal decision of returning to Naboo for the final two Acts is manufactured Jar-Jar.
Doescher also likes to make vague references to other movies, books, etc. From Dr. Seuss, to Liam Neeson films, even from The Bard himself. They may be tricky to find, but some are unmistakable. In Doescher’s afterword, he says that each line of Mace Windu’s has “a little something special thrown in for the Samuel L. Jackson fans.”
THE BAD:
The play is very long. The entire story of "The Phantom Menace" is re-created, scene for scene from the movie with Doescher only going off-script at least twice. The constant cutting back and forth from scene to scene to accommodate for a few lines of dialogue causes the story to drag.
What adds to the play’s reading time is the narration of action scenes. Often what happens in stage plays is action is only portrayed in stage directions. In many plays, pivotal conversations and events even happen off-stage. Doescher chooses to expand on these scenes from the film as opposed to glossing over them. This can cause moments to become long and drawn out, especially during action scenes when there was very little to no spoken dialogue in the film.
The story also lacks true depth. With Shakespeare’s original works, readers can analyze and interpret the text in different ways. Dialogues and monologues carry far greater weight and deeper messages than just reciting the occurring events.
Doescher’s writing is more the latter, just a narration of events written in iambic-pentameter, a feat not to be downplayed.
RATING
“William Shakespeare’s The Phantom of Menace” is a fun read for those who are both Shakespeare fans and Star Wars fans. It is easy to pick up and read if one is only the latter. Doescher adds much to the film’s dramatization in terms of character development and giving them agencies. However, in terms of length, Doescher’s additions can be too much.



